Reading Response 8

Montefiore:

I found Montefiore's epilogue a fitting conclusion to Armstrong's work. The epilogue was thorough and conveyed a solid understanding of the contemporary situation. However, there are differences compared to Armstrong's work. Specifically, Montefiore is not as concerned with maintaining a general sense of objectivity in judgement. Montefiore often uses value laden words; for example, he refers to Israeli actions as "colonizing" or "invasive" rather than use strictly technical or balanced terms. Perhaps this tendency is only present in the epilogue; however, Montefiore emphasizes his personal judgement, relative to Armstrong. This trait does not devalue the work; however, it must be actively considered when reading.

Chazan:

As I wrote about last week, the contemporary conflict is often framed by very simplistic interpretations. To this end, I appreciate Chazan's essay, Owning Our Identity. I agree that Netanyahu's recent actions are continually pushing the conflict towards "black and white" when it should remain (and be solved) firmly within a shade of grey. Identity is fluid; the region's distinct peoples have changed their self conception innumerable times over the course of history. Thus, identity cannot be concretely defined; it is very much the construction of popular or powerful opinion. Thus, Chazan is absolutely correct with her assertion that attempts to codify a state-endorsed "Jewish identity" represent dangerous trends. The ultraright attempts to mandate "loyalty oaths" and brand secular-Israel as a Jewish state can be seen as responses to perceived increasing isolation, both domestic and abroad. Unfortunately, such reactionary measures will like only increase said isolation and fracturing of opinion.

Initial proposal:

Ideally, my project will focus on Jerusalem and the Arab-Israeli conflict through the context of sport. Sport is an extremely powerful entity. Sport has the ability to erase difference and breed unity while simultaneously heightening existing conflict. This paradox is revealing; the pitch (or ring, field, etc) is a microcosm of the societal setting. My project will incorporate research and findings from a previous class; this previous project investigated the role and effects of internationalization in sports teams. This focus on the effects of cultural diversity within a team is especially relevant in this class' context.

At this time, I am not completely clear on the exact direction my project will follow. Israel has numerous internationally prominent sports teams, such as Maccabi Haifa and Maccabi Tel Aviv. I could look at the cultural dynamics of these terms, with regards to player/supporter demographics. I also could take a more micro approach and investigate the place of sport specifically in Jerusalem. To this end, I would incorporate suggestions given in class, specifically with regards to local soccer leagues and boxing. This micro approach would focus on the direct interaction of Jerusalem's various social and religious groups.